• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Promising the Moon

 
Marshal
Posts: 79392
377
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
I opned a new tab on FF and it showed me what is new in“Pocket,” as usually happens. I clicked on this link which is Big Think asking how you can fold paper thick enough to reach the moon. They said you need to fold it 42× to get a stack tall enough to reach the Moon. They must have been reading Douglas Adams. But I challenge readers: if you have an A4 sheet, 297×210×0.1mm, how wide would the stack of paper be after its 42nd fold ?
 
Marshal
Posts: 28258
95
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
Well, of course it would be microscopically small. That's why the current record holder for paper-folding chose a piece of paper which was nothing like A4.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 79392
377
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
Even her piece of paper ¾ mile long wouldn't be large enough.

Paul Clapham wrote:Well, of course it would be microscopically small.

Smaller than that. I made it about 1.4e-12m starting with A4. 1.4pm, while the size of a hydrogen atom is more like 0.1nm (1 Angstrom if you like old measurements). Long before this time, you would have to slice the cellulose molecules in the paper in pieces :wink:
 
Marshal
Posts: 8880
638
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
It is quite interesting when you think about it. Indeed.
 
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 27851
196
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
You should check out a proper authority such as Randall Monroe.

The problem with doubling anything is that the more you fold it, the harder it gets to fold it next time.

However, there's no need to write fancy algorithms to compute. Since you're doing a binary fold, to reach the moon, you just need to compute t*2^n, where "t" is the thickness of one sheet of paper, solving for n and assuming absolutely no space between layers.

Conversely, the horizontal dimensions would be the original paper size proportional to division by 2^n assuming you fold in an aspect-preserving way and assuming that the fold point has no dimension of its own (though in actuality, the fold point would be as wide as the folded paper is thick).
 
Paul Clapham
Marshal
Posts: 28258
95
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:

Campbell Ritchie wrote:I made it about 1.4e-12m starting with A4. 1.4pm, while the size of a hydrogen atom is more like 0.1nm (1 Angstrom if you like old measurements). Long before this time, you would have to slice the cellulose molecules in the paper in pieces :wink:

When you fold the paper with width W in half, you don't end up with a width of W/2. Some of the width contributes to the new (doubled) thickness, so the new width is more like (W-T)/2. Starting from an A4, the width is then less than the thickness after 8 folds. And it's mechanically difficult to fold a flat object with a non-trivial thickness in half -- try folding your phone's charging cable in half and you'll see that making the result be flat requires breaking things -- so you'd be hard pressed to achieve even 7 folds.

I'm sure I'm redoing the calculations done by all those other people on the web who have come up with 7 or 8 folds as the maximum.
 
Campbell Ritchie
Marshal
Posts: 79392
377
  • Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
You would have to cut the creases on the paper once the thickness of each fold is greater than its width. If not earlier.
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
vceplus-200-125    | boson-200-125    | training-cissp    | actualtests-cissp    | techexams-cissp    | gratisexams-300-075    | pearsonitcertification-210-260    | examsboost-210-260    | examsforall-210-260    | dumps4free-210-260    | reddit-210-260    | cisexams-352-001    | itexamfox-352-001    | passguaranteed-352-001    | passeasily-352-001    | freeccnastudyguide-200-120    | gocertify-200-120    | passcerty-200-120    | certifyguide-70-980    | dumpscollection-70-980    | examcollection-70-534    | cbtnuggets-210-065    | examfiles-400-051    | passitdump-400-051    | pearsonitcertification-70-462    | anderseide-70-347    | thomas-70-533    | research-1V0-605    | topix-102-400    | certdepot-EX200    | pearsonit-640-916    | itproguru-70-533    | reddit-100-105    | channel9-70-346    | anderseide-70-346    | theiia-IIA-CIA-PART3    | certificationHP-hp0-s41    | pearsonitcertification-640-916    | anderMicrosoft-70-534    | cathMicrosoft-70-462    | examcollection-cca-500    | techexams-gcih    | mslearn-70-346    | measureup-70-486    | pass4sure-hp0-s41    | iiba-640-916    | itsecurity-sscp    | cbtnuggets-300-320    | blogged-70-486    | pass4sure-IIA-CIA-PART1    | cbtnuggets-100-101    | developerhandbook-70-486    | lpicisco-101    | mylearn-1V0-605    | tomsitpro-cism    | gnosis-101    | channel9Mic-70-534    | ipass-IIA-CIA-PART1    | forcerts-70-417    | tests-sy0-401    | ipasstheciaexam-IIA-CIA-PART3    | mostcisco-300-135    | buildazure-70-533    | cloudera-cca-500    | pdf4cert-2v0-621    | f5cisco-101    | gocertify-1z0-062    | quora-640-916    | micrcosoft-70-480    | brain2pass-70-417    | examcompass-sy0-401    | global-EX200    | iassc-ICGB    | vceplus-300-115    | quizlet-810-403    | cbtnuggets-70-697    | educationOracle-1Z0-434    | channel9-70-534    | officialcerts-400-051    | examsboost-IIA-CIA-PART1    | networktut-300-135    | teststarter-300-206    | pluralsight-70-486    | coding-70-486    | freeccna-100-101    | digitaltut-300-101    | iiba-CBAP    | virtuallymikebrown-640-916    | isaca-cism    | whizlabs-pmp    | techexams-70-980    | ciscopress-300-115    | techtarget-cism    | pearsonitcertification-300-070    | testking-2v0-621    | isacaNew-cism    | simplilearn-pmi-rmp    | simplilearn-pmp    | educationOracle-1z0-809    | education-1z0-809    | teachertube-1Z0-434    | villanovau-CBAP    | quora-300-206    | certifyguide-300-208    | cbtnuggets-100-105    | flydumps-70-417    | gratisexams-1V0-605    | ituonline-1z0-062    | techexams-cas-002    | simplilearn-70-534    | pluralsight-70-697    | theiia-IIA-CIA-PART1    | itexamtips-400-051    | pearsonitcertification-EX200    | pluralsight-70-480    | learn-hp0-s42    | giac-gpen    | mindhub-102-400    | coursesmsu-CBAP    | examsforall-2v0-621    | developerhandbook-70-487    | root-EX200    | coderanch-1z0-809    | getfreedumps-1z0-062    | comptia-cas-002    | quora-1z0-809    | boson-300-135    | killtest-2v0-621    | learncia-IIA-CIA-PART3    | computer-gcih    | universitycloudera-cca-500    | itexamrun-70-410    | certificationHPv2-hp0-s41    | certskills-100-105    | skipitnow-70-417    | gocertify-sy0-401    | prep4sure-70-417    | simplilearn-cisa    |
http://www.pmsas.pr.gov.br/wp-content/    | http://www.pmsas.pr.gov.br/wp-content/    |